Repaying training costs on resignation – is the clause valid?
Likely invalid — such a clause does not bind you.
A repayment clause for training costs is only valid under settled BAG case law on § 307 BGB if (1) the tied period is proportionate to the training duration (max. 5 years), (2) the repayment obligation reduces pro rata over time, and (3) the obligation lapses when termination is the employer's doing. Missing any of these renders the entire clause void.
What you can do next
Bei Fehlen einer zeitanteiligen Reduzierung oder einer Bindungsdauer über 5 Jahren ist die Klausel unwirksam — Sie müssen nichts zurückzahlen.
The law behind it
Check your own clause — free
Paste the clause from your contract. You get the verdict for your wording in a few seconds.
The check compares your clause with patterns verified by lawyers and the current statute text. It is general information, not legal advice for your individual case.
Free risk preview, full report €6,90 — every problem clause with the law behind it and what to do.
Check the whole contractRelated questions
- "Overtime is covered by the salary" – is that valid?
- Exclusion period shorter than three months in an employment contract – valid?
- Fixed term without objective reason for more than two years – allowed?
- Longer notice period for the employee than for the employer – valid?
- Shorter deadline for an unfair-dismissal claim in the contract – does it apply?
- What must an employment contract state under the Nachweisgesetz?
General information based on German law and court decisions, checked by lawyers — not legal advice for your individual case.