Pro-rata redecoration cost clause (Quotenabgeltung) – is it valid?
Likely invalid — such a clause does not bind you.
Standard-form pro-rata clauses requiring the tenant to pay a share of not-yet-due cosmetic repairs on move-out are void (BGH VIII ZR 242/13).
What you can do next
Diese Quotenklausel ist unwirksam. Sie müssen keine anteiligen Renovierungskosten bei Auszug zahlen.
The law behind it
BGH VIII ZR 242/13 · 2015-03-18
Rigid renovation schedules for cosmetic repairs are void because they unreasonably disadvantage the tenant.
Check your own clause — free
Paste the clause from your contract. You get the verdict for your wording in a few seconds.
The check compares your clause with patterns verified by lawyers and the current statute text. It is general information, not legal advice for your individual case.
Free risk preview, full report €6,90 — every problem clause with the law behind it and what to do.
Check the whole contractRelated questions
- Cosmetic repairs on a flat handed over unrenovated – do I have to redecorate?
- Rigid redecoration intervals in the rental contract – valid?
- Landlord takes on the cosmetic repairs – what does that mean?
- Set-off ban in a rental contract – can the landlord do that?
- Fixed-term rental contract without a reason – is the term valid?
- Landlord may enter the flat at any time – is that allowed?
General information based on German law and court decisions, checked by lawyers — not legal advice for your individual case.